From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Using Ada (or SPARK) in Ada-unaware environment
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:26:35 +0000
Date: 2006-01-19T20:26:35+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m27j8wufpg.fsf@grendel.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dqoc7b$hgf$1@sunnews.cern.ch
Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com> writes:
> This wrapper for the device library can be either a module or a
> separate program. Separate program makes sense, because can be
> accessed also by other controllers, which do not even need to be
> written in Ada (think about scripting tools).
I don't see why you need separate *programs* to achieve this. My
experience is with a shared library (Unix) setup:
basic.so <----+--------------------- Ada program
|
+---- tclbinding.so -- Tcl program
but thinking back the underlying architecture was a shared-memory
scheme and basic.so provided the interface to that. Clearly
_something_ has to be shared!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-19 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 9:05 Using Ada (or SPARK) in Ada-unaware environment Maciej Sobczak
2006-01-19 10:16 ` Niklas Holsti
2006-01-19 10:21 ` Peter Amey
2006-01-19 20:05 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-01-20 5:08 ` tmoran
2006-01-19 15:00 ` Steve
2006-01-19 15:45 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-01-19 20:26 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2006-01-20 0:50 ` John
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox