From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Extend Record in Spec and Body
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:49:23 +0100
Date: 2006-10-17T19:49:23+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m27iyyok0c.fsf@grendel.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: acayl5xzj1xx.qr6vffqk731z.dlg@40tude.net
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> Yes, but not in the body and each extension would produce a new
> type.
I have written code that extends an abstract tagged type (declared in
the package spec) in the package body, why would that be a problem?
(in fact I do it 3 times ...)
--S
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-17 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-16 15:30 Extend Record in Spec and Body richard.charts
2006-10-16 16:53 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-10-16 17:20 ` Richard Charts
2006-10-17 0:33 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-10-17 1:11 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-10-17 7:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-10-17 18:49 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2006-10-17 20:19 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox