From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Concurrency always is non-deterministic?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:13:47 +0000
Date: 2012-02-14T01:13:47+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m24nuu2p4k.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CB5F1B52.1013F%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk
Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> writes:
> On 13/02/2012 19:38, in article m28vk634mr.fsf@pushface.org, "Simon Wright"
> <simon@pushface.org> wrote:
>> A somewhat different statement from the one I'm used to, which is pretty
>> much as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_computing
>
> "The needs of real-time software requires the use of one or more synchronous
> programming languages" ??
>
> Methinks someone is grinding a proprietary axe.
Hmm. I've added a query to the Disputed section of the Talk page.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-14 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 17:41 Concurrency always is non-deterministic? Long Hoàng Đình
2012-02-13 18:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-02-13 19:38 ` Simon Wright
2012-02-13 19:56 ` Bill Findlay
2012-02-14 1:13 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2012-02-14 11:29 ` John B. Matthews
2012-02-14 2:34 ` Phil Clayton
2012-02-13 18:06 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-02-13 19:11 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-02-13 22:10 ` Brian Drummond
2012-02-14 2:18 ` Phil Clayton
2012-02-14 10:05 ` Erich
2012-02-14 15:00 ` Phil Clayton
2012-02-14 18:23 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox