From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: protected type interrupts
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:11:16 +0100
Date: 2006-08-24T21:11:16+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21wr5ao7v.fsf@grendel.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1156430839.745932.279060@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com
"REH" <spamjunk@stny.rr.com> writes:
> With newer versions of their compiler, the computer resets. They
> say it is because they are calling the entry at the interrupt level,
> and not the task level (we process this in a task because we have to
> do things you cannot do in a interrupt). They say the LRM allows
> them to do this.
So why do they support POs as interrupt handlers at all? what do they
expect you to do?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-24 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 14:47 protected type interrupts REH
2006-08-24 15:39 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 16:23 ` REH
2006-08-24 18:15 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-08-24 19:16 ` REH
2006-08-24 21:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2006-08-24 21:39 ` REH
2006-08-25 6:45 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 23:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:42 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 23:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:38 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-24 20:11 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2006-08-24 23:50 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 6:48 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-25 11:33 ` REH
2006-08-25 17:27 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-08-25 20:57 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-25 23:17 ` REH
2006-08-26 6:38 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-08-26 13:16 ` REH
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox