From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Strategies with SPARK which does not support exceptions
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:08:58 +0100
Date: 2010-06-30T06:08:58+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21vbpyumt.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: i0djn0$11a$1@munin.nbi.dk
"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
> This is exactly why I'm not much interested in SPARK itself: because
> it forces programs back into the style that I originally learned for
> Fortran IV in 1976: no dynamic allocation, no dynamic calls, no
> exceptions -- no interest! I'm interested in what SPARK brings to the
> table in proof capabilities, but I see no reason to give up 3/4rds of
> Ada to get it.
Complete agreement here!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-17 15:33 Strategies with SPARK which does not support exceptions Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-17 17:11 ` Warren
2010-06-17 18:19 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-21 13:31 ` Warren
2010-06-21 14:10 ` Alexandre K
2010-06-17 19:54 ` Pascal Obry
2010-06-17 22:47 ` Peter C. Chapin
2010-06-18 6:07 ` Claude
2010-06-18 8:06 ` Phil Thornley
2010-06-18 8:49 ` Martin
2010-06-18 17:16 ` mockturtle
2010-06-18 21:51 ` Alexandre K
2010-06-22 17:01 ` Phil Clayton
2010-06-22 23:14 ` Claude
2010-06-23 16:22 ` Warren
2010-06-24 3:24 ` Claude
2010-06-28 13:14 ` Warren
2010-06-29 8:39 ` Stephen Leake
2010-06-29 20:05 ` Randy Brukardt
2010-06-29 20:49 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-06-30 5:08 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2010-06-30 8:17 ` stefan-lucks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox