From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Optional body for nested generic
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:18:57 +0100
Date: 2011-09-20T16:18:57+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21uvb2qe6.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: e0250423-8764-4f84-a770-43e7d16b8464@cd4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com> writes:
> On Sep 20, 5:48 am, Simon Wright <si...@pushface.org> wrote:
>> I was surprised to find that GNAT makes it optional to have a body for a
> ^^^^
>
> I believe you misspelled "Ada".
I knew for a fact that GNAT allowed it, but there have been cases where
GNAT allowed things it shouldn't have.
Thanks for confirming my suspicions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-20 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 12:48 Optional body for nested generic Simon Wright
2011-09-20 15:00 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-09-20 15:18 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2011-09-20 15:15 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-21 15:01 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-09-22 3:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-09-22 14:28 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-22 23:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-09-23 0:03 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox