* Non-GPL xml library ? @ 2012-07-16 5:35 Patrick 2012-07-16 7:25 ` Simon Wright 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Patrick @ 2012-07-16 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw) I have tried to re-read some of the old threads. This one mentioned xml/ada being as GPL: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/xml/comp.lang.ada/0PbDfjwbcSo/c9jYrwcRm6EJ and it seems that it might have been GMGPL at first. I hope I don't upset anyone but I am not in a GPL headspace right now, for me it's the worst possible situation. I am afraid to violate someone else's license but not willing to sue anyone for violating mine. If I end up with code/software I would like to redistribute, I would like to use Beerware/BSD/MIT. Is there an xml library that is not GPL? Did this list seem pretty complete: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/currently$20maintained/comp.lang.ada/bP3ERua76Lo/yzKxLzn6rJcJ I could try to sort it by license if someone thinks it's a useful thing to do. I'm concerned as no xml was mentioned. Without Adacore's GPL libraries I guess I am in a bad spot. -Patrick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Non-GPL xml library ? 2012-07-16 5:35 Non-GPL xml library ? Patrick @ 2012-07-16 7:25 ` Simon Wright 2012-07-16 13:17 ` Patrick 2012-07-18 6:18 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Wright @ 2012-07-16 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw) Patrick <patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org> writes: > I have tried to re-read some of the old threads. This one mentioned > xml/ada being as GPL: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/xml/comp.lang.ada/0PbDfjwbcSo/c9jYrwcRm6EJ > > and it seems that it might have been GMGPL at first. > > I hope I don't upset anyone but I am not in a GPL headspace right now, > for me it's the worst possible situation. I am afraid to violate > someone else's license but not willing to sue anyone for violating > mine. > > If I end up with code/software I would like to redistribute, I would > like to use Beerware/BSD/MIT. > > Is there an xml library that is not GPL? Matreshka[1] supports SAX processing. [1] http://forge.ada-ru.org/matreshka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Non-GPL xml library ? 2012-07-16 7:25 ` Simon Wright @ 2012-07-16 13:17 ` Patrick 2012-07-17 7:59 ` Vadim Godunko 2012-07-18 6:18 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Patrick @ 2012-07-16 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi Simon Matreshka looks full of good stuff and I did read about it before posting but can the xml portion be decoupled from the rest of the project? Thanks for answering my post-Patrick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Non-GPL xml library ? 2012-07-16 13:17 ` Patrick @ 2012-07-17 7:59 ` Vadim Godunko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Vadim Godunko @ 2012-07-17 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw) On Monday, July 16, 2012 5:17:13 PM UTC+4, Patrick wrote: > > Matreshka looks full of good stuff and I did read about it before posting but can the xml portion be decoupled from the rest of the project? > Yes, you can. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Non-GPL xml library ? 2012-07-16 7:25 ` Simon Wright 2012-07-16 13:17 ` Patrick @ 2012-07-18 6:18 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) 2012-07-18 11:45 ` Maxim Reznik 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) @ 2012-07-18 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw) Le Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:25:12 +0200, Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> a écrit: > Patrick <patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org> writes: > >> I have tried to re-read some of the old threads. This one mentioned >> xml/ada being as GPL: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/xml/comp.lang.ada/0PbDfjwbcSo/c9jYrwcRm6EJ >> >> and it seems that it might have been GMGPL at first. >> >> I hope I don't upset anyone but I am not in a GPL headspace right now, >> for me it's the worst possible situation. I am afraid to violate >> someone else's license but not willing to sue anyone for violating >> mine. >> >> If I end up with code/software I would like to redistribute, I would >> like to use Beerware/BSD/MIT. >> >> Is there an xml library that is not GPL? > > Matreshka[1] supports SAX processing. > > [1] http://forge.ada-ru.org/matreshka Is it widely used? -- “Syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.” [1] “Structured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.” [1] [1]: Epigrams on Programming — Alan J. — P. Yale University ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Non-GPL xml library ? 2012-07-18 6:18 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) @ 2012-07-18 11:45 ` Maxim Reznik 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Maxim Reznik @ 2012-07-18 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw) > > Is it widely used? We use it (strings API, XML read and write API, SQL API). It's nice. Now we are implementing an Ada code generator from UML using Matreshka's Ada Modelling Framework. -- Maxim Reznik ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-24 6:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-07-16 5:35 Non-GPL xml library ? Patrick 2012-07-16 7:25 ` Simon Wright 2012-07-16 13:17 ` Patrick 2012-07-17 7:59 ` Vadim Godunko 2012-07-18 6:18 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) 2012-07-18 11:45 ` Maxim Reznik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox