From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Non-GPL xml library ?
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:25:12 +0100
Date: 2012-07-16T08:25:12+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21ukcmalj.fsf@nidhoggr.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 73839bb3-e623-4adb-8886-7adfa47258b9@googlegroups.com
Patrick <patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org> writes:
> I have tried to re-read some of the old threads. This one mentioned
> xml/ada being as GPL:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/xml/comp.lang.ada/0PbDfjwbcSo/c9jYrwcRm6EJ
>
> and it seems that it might have been GMGPL at first.
>
> I hope I don't upset anyone but I am not in a GPL headspace right now,
> for me it's the worst possible situation. I am afraid to violate
> someone else's license but not willing to sue anyone for violating
> mine.
>
> If I end up with code/software I would like to redistribute, I would
> like to use Beerware/BSD/MIT.
>
> Is there an xml library that is not GPL?
Matreshka[1] supports SAX processing.
[1] http://forge.ada-ru.org/matreshka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-24 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-16 5:35 Non-GPL xml library ? Patrick
2012-07-16 7:25 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2012-07-16 13:17 ` Patrick
2012-07-17 7:59 ` Vadim Godunko
2012-07-18 6:18 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2012-07-18 11:45 ` Maxim Reznik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox