From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 Language Designer
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:13:49 -0700
Date: 2014-10-08T10:13:49-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m13rcd$c6d$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e91de1d3-0e45-4744-a291-54d9a1af4631@googlegroups.com>
On 10/08/2014 07:16 AM, David Botton wrote:
>
> As per a previous thread, not having Object.Method really hurt Ada at a time
> when it needed it, now it is an uphill battle to get application developers
> to look at it seriously again. IMO.
Ada has always had Object.Operation notation, as long as Object was a pkg or task.
--
Jeff Carter
"I would never want to belong to any club that
would have someone like me for a member."
Annie Hall
41
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 13:44 Ada 2005 Language Designer G.B.
2014-10-08 14:16 ` David Botton
2014-10-08 15:15 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-10-08 18:22 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-10-08 19:07 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-10-08 19:12 ` David Botton
2014-10-08 17:13 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2014-10-08 17:17 ` David Botton
2014-10-08 18:30 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-10-08 20:35 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-10-08 21:26 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-10-09 20:18 ` Shark8
2014-10-09 23:33 ` Peter Chapin
2014-10-09 20:14 ` Shark8
2014-10-09 1:07 ` brbarkstrom
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox