From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: My bug or else regarding Visibility Rules
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:26:12 +0100
Date: 2013-04-02T09:26:12+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lywqslgwyj.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d09afc35-2ca5-4b45-9734-7263e6d353c4@googlegroups.com
Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
> I try to put as much as post-conditions that the language allows. On
> the other hand, I do not want to expose any thing that the clients can
> modify. In addition, taking away post-conditions involving Buffer,
> In_Index, and Out_Index objects by moving them into the body does
> degrade much implementation promise in this case.
This is (partly) why we now have expression functions; specify the
function in the public part, use it in a pre/postcondition, complete it
with an expression function in the private part when Buffer etc. are
visible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 19:54 My bug or else regarding Visibility Rules Anh Vo
2013-03-28 20:58 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-03-28 22:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-03-30 6:05 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-02 0:56 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-04-02 1:52 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-02 8:26 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2013-04-02 18:17 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-02 20:16 ` Simon Wright
2013-04-03 23:21 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-04 8:19 ` Simon Wright
2013-04-04 19:21 ` Anh Vo
2013-04-04 19:47 ` Simon Wright
2013-04-02 22:04 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-03-28 22:06 ` Anh Vo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox