From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Aspect CPU
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:00:26 +0000
Date: 2014-01-15T20:00:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lytxd5uiat.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 74bb1a6c-4239-448b-aa0c-41684cc0fdf5@googlegroups.com
Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
> By the way, do you mind to tell which
> section of RM showing this declarative syntax.
For tasks, 9.1(2),
http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-9-1.html#p2
There doesn't seem to be an overarching rule for aspect syntax. You
might have thought that the aspects would always come before the 'is',
perhaps, but not so: see 3.2.1(3),
http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-3-2-1.html#p3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-15 1:56 Aspect CPU Anh Vo
2014-01-15 7:06 ` Egil H H
2014-01-15 16:54 ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 20:00 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2014-01-15 20:18 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-15 22:10 ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 22:04 ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 23:25 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox