From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Can anyone help with GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators ? (Possible memory corruption)
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:04:03 +0100
Date: 2016-09-08T18:04:03+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lyr38us4qk.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 0b79fce9-b898-4a1c-91fb-ca41e87b4dd5@googlegroups.com
Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
> Then, what would be the proper fix?
To what? If you mean the apparent bug in GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators
then I have to say that's one of the more opaque pieces of Ada that I've
seen, not helped by being implemented over another piece of complex
software (GNAT.Table). Of course, it's implementing a complex algorithm.
I suppose it was written before Ada.Containers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-04 19:22 Can anyone help with GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators ? (Possible memory corruption) Natasha Kerensikova
2016-09-05 17:18 ` Stephen Leake
2016-09-06 19:24 ` Natasha Kerensikova
2016-09-06 19:52 ` Florian Weimer
2016-09-06 20:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-09-06 21:04 ` Simon Wright
2016-09-08 16:00 ` Anh Vo
2016-09-08 17:04 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2016-09-08 18:03 ` Anh Vo
2016-09-08 18:10 ` Simon Wright
2016-09-08 19:08 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-09-09 6:04 ` Natasha Kerensikova
2016-09-09 6:15 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-09-09 8:25 ` J-P. Rosen
2016-09-08 19:19 ` Florian Weimer
2016-09-06 19:44 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox