From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Can anyone help with GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators ? (Possible
 memory corruption)
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:04:03 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyr38us4qk.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <slrnnsot2o.1cq.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
	<397dd8cb-2afc-43cd-972d-3b1a5a90cd5d@googlegroups.com>
	<slrnnsu608.1cq.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
	<877fao24da.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <lyoa40rb84.fsf@pushface.org>
	<0b79fce9-b898-4a1c-91fb-ca41e87b4dd5@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="90a7515de723fda2443060f3e878f4b0";
	logging-data="21620"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+bf//ZKLrh6CdCW4d7zpYr8kt9u/bm6kQ="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pmpgexKilBn/CK2ZZ0pQM7C7PIY=
	sha1:lRcFkNxvE2L7H4gbgrU4ejUU2Oc=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31729
Date: 2016-09-08T18:04:03+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:

> Then, what would be the proper fix?

To what? If you mean the apparent bug in GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators
then I have to say that's one of the more opaque pieces of Ada that I've
seen, not helped by being implemented over another piece of complex
software (GNAT.Table). Of course, it's implementing a complex algorithm.

I suppose it was written before Ada.Containers.