From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Writing Linux Kernel Modules in Ada
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 09:39:58 +0000
Date: 2016-11-06T09:39:58+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lypom96j69.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9ccbd90f-74c0-402b-9b2a-ff475ec2198b@googlegroups.com
artium@nihamkin.com writes:
> Part 2, incorporating the secondary stack into the run time.
>
> http://www.nihamkin.com/2016/11/05/writing-linux-modules-in-ada-part-2/
Interesting!
What about elaboration? Have you considered the restriction
No_Elaboration_Code? (would it help?)
(On a purely personal note, I find heavy grey (and black) backgrounds
painful to read.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-06 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-23 13:49 Writing Linux Kernel Modules in Ada artium
2016-10-24 11:12 ` Brian Drummond
2016-10-29 2:19 ` Coyo T Stormcaller
2016-10-29 14:11 ` Hadrien G.
2016-10-29 20:16 ` Simon Clubley
2016-10-29 21:12 ` Coyo T Stormcaller
2016-10-29 21:25 ` Simon Clubley
2016-10-29 22:09 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2016-10-29 22:48 ` Simon Clubley
2016-11-05 22:31 ` artium
2016-11-06 9:39 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2016-11-19 18:15 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2016-12-21 14:47 ` Lucretia
2016-10-29 22:54 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-10-29 21:09 ` Coyo T Stormcaller
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox