From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: When to expect bugs fixed?
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 07:36:59 +0000
Date: 2014-11-02T07:36:59+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lyoasqgijo.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m33oh9$675$1@speranza.aioe.org
Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> writes:
> Simon Wright wrote:
>
>> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
>>
>>> generic
>>> type Record_Type; -- It should be an untagged record for C
>>> compatibility type Record_Type_Access is access Record_Type; -- should
>>> have convention C
>>> package RDF.Auxilary.Handled_Record is
>>>
>>> subtype Access_Type is Record_Type_Access;
>>
>> Or even
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> generic
>> type Record_Type; -- It should be an untagged record for C
> compatibility
>> type Access_Type is access Record_Type; -- should have convention C
>> package RDF.Auxilary.Handled_Record is>
> ========================================================================
>
> I think, this is wrong: It tempts to use Access_Type which is NOT
> convention C by default!
I would have been (only very slightly) less inclined to suggest this if
you had not already said (in the line above) that Record_Type "should be
an untagged record for C". But it's a *workround*!!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-02 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-01 17:24 When to expect bugs fixed? Victor Porton
2014-11-01 17:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2014-11-01 17:55 ` Victor Porton
2014-11-01 21:02 ` Anh Vo
2014-11-01 22:41 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-01 22:48 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-01 22:57 ` Victor Porton
2014-11-02 7:36 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2014-11-03 15:46 ` Tero Koskinen
2014-11-03 17:00 ` Luke A. Guest
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox