Re: Q: setting an address with pure?

[Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>]

rrr.eee.27@gmail.com writes:

> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 at 2:25:34 PM UTC+2, Brian Drummond wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 14:30:14 +0100, Simon Wright wrote:
>> 
>> > Brian Drummond writes:
>> > 
>> >> Does the following work for you?
>> >>    For adc10dtc0'Address use   16#48#;
>> 
>> > 
>> >    128.    PIOG : PIO with Volatile, Convention => Ada;
>> >    129.    for PIOG'Address use 16#400E1C00#;
>> >                                 |
>> >         >>> expected private type "System.Address"
>> >         >>> found type universal integer
>> > 
>> > (same with GNAT GPL 2015)
>> 
>> Thank you - and Rasika Srinivasan - forthis conversation. When I get
>> back to the MSP430 version I'll retrofit this.
>
> Brian, as far as I remember you started MSP430-Ada as a copy of
> AVR-Ada. I made the type System.Address globaly visible as a 32-bit
> unsigned. That's why the above statements work in AVR-Ada and probably
> in MSP-Ada

Whereas I was minimising the differences from a standard GNAT RTS. I
never even thought of making this sort of change!