Re: Interresting difference in Normal-Returns/Expression-Functions and Extended-Returns.

[Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>]

Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com> writes:

> I still think that anonymous access types should only be used when
> necessary, since there are special accessibility level rules for
> anonymous access types that have some surprising consequences.  There
> may be cases where it's beneficial to take advantage of those special
> rules.  But one should not use anonymous access types just because
> "hey, Ada lets us do it now and I can just throw in a pointer without
> having to think up a type name, like C programmers get to do!".  A
> good rule might be "don't use anonymous access types unless you've
> read 3.10.2 and understand it thoroughly."  (OK, that was a joke.)

This sounds like wise advice, that should go into a style guide.