From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Comparing Access Types
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:29:26 +0000
Date: 2017-11-09T08:29:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lyefp7hn2x.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b3976d73-296f-4958-bfb2-26bf49901a48@googlegroups.com
Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com> writes:
> I have a package which uses a type to wrap an access type. I thought
> it might be nice to provide the basic comparison functions, "=", "<",
> ">", etc. but access types can only be compared using "=" and "/=".
> I figured that way, my types could be used in some sort of sorted
> container, like a map.
I've used a hashed container.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-09 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-09 5:37 Comparing Access Types Jere
2017-11-09 8:29 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2017-11-09 8:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-11-09 22:38 ` Robert A Duff
2017-11-10 8:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-11-10 15:11 ` Jere
2017-11-10 16:05 ` Robert A Duff
2017-11-10 16:30 ` Robert A Duff
2017-11-16 1:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-11-18 22:01 ` Robert A Duff
2017-11-20 22:25 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-11-21 0:30 ` Shark8
2017-11-21 8:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-11-22 1:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-11-10 15:20 ` Jere
2017-11-10 16:00 ` Robert A Duff
2017-11-10 16:22 ` Jere
2017-11-10 15:06 ` Jere
2017-11-16 1:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-11-16 1:13 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox