From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Question: What's the difference between pools of pools and Ada 2012's new subpools?
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:47:11 +0000
Date: 2013-02-17T11:47:11+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lyd2vzqi0w.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1f5hzkoyu135m.8modyeyr3mtp$.dlg@40tude.net
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> As Randy said the problem with pools when used for management the life
> cycle of objects is finalization of controlled objects. If subpools
> alleviate this problem is to be seen.
What Randy said was that the _hand-written_ subpool implementations the
ARG had seen had problems with finalizable objects. Of coaurse, in the
end all implementations are hand-written by somebody.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-17 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 0:12 Question: What's the difference between pools of pools and Ada 2012's new subpools? Shark8
2013-02-14 0:56 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-02-14 2:34 ` Shark8
2013-02-17 1:06 ` Shark8
2013-02-17 9:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2013-02-17 11:47 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2013-02-18 23:24 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox