From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Can .ads be compiled alone?
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:50:24 +0000
Date: 2014-11-17T06:50:24+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lybno69v7z.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 558e3ad3-8d64-46f4-a0ca-6df137b256ec@googlegroups.com
rriehle@itu.edu writes:
> The code, in the example, which I originally published in my book, Ada
> Distilled, was compiled with GNAT. I first compiled the
> specification, and then the body.
The trouble is that if you use GNAT to compile a spec that needs a body
you get
$ gnatmake -c -u -f driver.ads
gcc -c driver.ads
cannot generate code for file driver.ads (package spec)
gnatmake: "driver.ads" compilation error
and this confuses a *lot* of new users.
The latest Emacs ada-mode doesn't offer a 'compile current file'
option. Instead, -gnatc (Check syntax and semantics only (no code
generation)) is used (bound to C-c C-v), and is extremely effective.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-17 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 5:21 Can .ads be compiled alone? moixa
2014-11-07 6:09 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-11-07 17:26 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-07 17:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-11-07 6:20 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-11-07 7:48 ` Chris Moore
2014-11-07 14:54 ` Tero Koskinen
2014-11-07 15:49 ` Björn Lundin
2014-11-07 16:29 ` G.B.
2014-11-08 13:01 ` moixa
2014-11-08 14:55 ` G.B.
2014-11-07 16:29 ` G.B.
2014-11-07 16:44 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-11-07 17:14 ` Shark8
2014-11-08 21:31 ` Chris Moore
2014-11-07 16:50 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-11-07 17:14 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-08 2:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-11-15 12:54 ` rriehle
2014-11-15 19:17 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-15 19:19 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-17 15:52 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-11-17 0:07 ` rriehle
2014-11-17 6:50 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2014-11-24 3:16 ` rriehle
2014-11-24 6:34 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox