From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Two-stage suspend operations
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 20:26:28 +0100
Date: 2016-05-08T20:26:28+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lybn4gqrkr.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9e93195a-eba0-4793-a64c-a24613090b3c@googlegroups.com
rieachus@comcast.net writes:
> On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 12:13:19 PM UTC-4, Simon Wright wrote:
>>
>> I've spent some time googling "two-stage suspend operations" and come
>> up empty...
>>
>> Has anyone any other references?
>
> Try "two phase locking" you should get about a million hits, and the
> first few I looked at were all on topic.
I don't see the connection; they're all about database locking, e.g
"A transaction is said to follow the two-phase locking protocol if
all locking operations (read_lock, write_lock) precede the first
unlock operation in the transaction. Such a transaction can be
divided into two phases:"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-08 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-07 16:13 Two-stage suspend operations Simon Wright
2016-05-08 3:56 ` rieachus
2016-05-08 19:26 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2016-05-09 2:12 ` rieachus
2016-05-09 8:56 ` Simon Wright
2016-05-09 23:15 ` rieachus
2016-05-10 5:46 ` Simon Wright
2016-05-10 21:14 ` rieachus
2016-05-11 8:55 ` Simon Wright
2016-05-11 21:20 ` rieachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox