From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Lightweight tasks to implement co-routines?
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 21:00:49 +0100
Date: 2017-07-31T21:00:49+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lybmo0qsum.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: olnrmv$1quu$1@gioia.aioe.org
Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> writes:
> If we so much modify the task API for implementing co-routines, isn't
> it lost the sense to use task API for this at all?
Consider the Ravenscar profile, which doesn't allow tasks to have
entries at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-31 18:08 Lightweight tasks to implement co-routines? Victor Porton
2017-07-31 20:00 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2017-07-31 21:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-08-01 4:56 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-08-01 6:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-08-01 4:53 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-08-01 6:49 ` Paul Rubin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox