From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Documentation tools and standards?
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:05:48 +0000
Date: 2013-12-14T09:05:48+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly8uvn3iqb.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d427d12b-732c-4e44-a704-c31498886253@googlegroups.com
Diogenes <phathax0r@gmail.com> writes:
> As far as the Requirements and Arch docs, are there any published
> standards and tools that the Ada community generally prefers when
> working with Ada code? Any links to those standards?
Some UK MoD contractors still work to MIL STD 498[1], or at least the
DIDs (which specify the required contents of each document type). The
problem with IEEE 12207 is that it's a lot less prescriptive than 498,
and, the last time I checked, it wasn't freely available (but see [2];
not sure of the legality of this).
[1] http://pushface.org/mil_498.html
[2] http://www.math.unipd.it/~tullio/IS-1/2009/Approfondimenti/ISO_12207-2008.pdf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-14 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 21:23 Documentation tools and standards? Diogenes
2013-12-13 22:37 ` erlo
2013-12-13 22:39 ` erlo
2013-12-14 8:30 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-12-14 9:05 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2013-12-14 10:00 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2013-12-14 23:37 ` Mike H
2013-12-17 10:11 ` Maurizio Tomasi
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox