From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: SPARK 2014 and protected objects
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:42:49 +0100
Date: 2016-08-31T08:42:49+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly8tvdidty.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2a104643-59b9-4a46-b543-5c124984bf43@googlegroups.com
Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com> writes:
> protected Impl
> with Part_Of => State
> is
> procedure Set (Value : Integer)
> with Depends => ((Impl =>+ Value));
> procedure Get (Value : out Integer)
> with Depends => (Impl => Impl, Value => Impl);
>
> private
> Protected_Value : Integer := 0;
> end Impl;
>
> -- GNAT doesn't allow Volatile on the protected object's with.
> Pragma Volatile(Impl);
We seem to have come up with (almost) the same solution, which gives me
confidence it's the right one. Thanks.
I had Protected_Value outside the PO because it's standing in for a
number of I/O registers communicating with devices on a shared SPI bus
via their /Chip Select lines. Not sure how to deal with the concept of
"a number of machine registers"!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-30 10:34 SPARK 2014 and protected objects Simon Wright
2016-08-30 14:45 ` Shark8
2016-08-30 15:33 ` Simon Wright
2016-08-30 18:42 ` Simon Wright
2016-08-30 18:47 ` Simon Wright
2016-08-31 0:11 ` Shark8
2016-08-31 7:42 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2016-08-31 15:41 ` Shark8
2016-08-31 20:55 ` Simon Wright
2016-09-01 20:07 ` Shark8
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox