From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Surprising behaviour of strings.fixed.overwrite
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:37 +0000
Date: 2014-11-13T12:40:37+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly61ejl1dm.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m41pam$9ni$1@speranza.aioe.org
Markus Schöpflin <no.spam@spam.spam> writes:
> But by now I think I'm better off creating my own set of functions and
> procedures which just do what I need, as it turns out that the
> standard implementation is rather slow, anyway.
No issue with creating your own subprograms, but GNAT's implementation
isn't the standard (the Standard contains no implementation, after all).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-12 10:49 Surprising behaviour of strings.fixed.overwrite Markus Schöpflin
2014-11-12 12:55 ` G.B.
2014-11-12 15:49 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-11-12 23:19 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-11-13 8:15 ` Markus Schöpflin
2014-11-13 12:40 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2014-11-13 12:56 ` Markus Schöpflin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox