From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Reduction expressions
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:36:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly5xs4d2ft.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
Are the Accum_Type & Value_Type (ARM 4.5.10(9/5)) of a reduction attribute
reference required to be definite?
ARM 4.5.10(24/5) & (25.5) seem to imply so, which explains why GNAT
doesn't support e.g. String.
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-13 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 12:36 Simon Wright [this message]
2024-08-20 3:59 ` Reduction expressions Randy Brukardt
2024-08-20 21:23 ` Simon Wright
2024-08-20 23:30 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-08-20 23:41 ` Keith Thompson
2024-08-21 1:37 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2024-08-21 7:47 ` Simon Wright
2024-08-24 4:27 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox