From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Any Suggestion How To Accomplish A Debug Macro?
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:21:50 +0000
Date: 2014-12-30T18:21:50+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly1tnhq9q9.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 82329c51-2302-468b-a5d0-3bfab3999014@googlegroups.com
sbelmont700@gmail.com writes:
> TWYF, FWYT. Having the compiler cull a bunch of your code, especially
> such I/O heavy code, and expecting it to work the same in the release
> is a bad idea (though there are better solutions than an if statement,
> e.g. observer pattern).
We did desktop testing (mainly functional, some timing) on Windows for
deployment on powerpc-wrs-vxworks. On-target validation & verification
was hugely simplified, and I don't recall any instances of on-target
failures that were down to compilation differences.
We retained the same logging in the two environments; on the host, via a
low-priority task to standard output; on the target, via ethernet to a
logging computer. So the Ada code of the subsystem under test wasn't
altered.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-30 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-30 3:12 Any Suggestion How To Accomplish A Debug Macro? Hubert
2014-12-30 11:14 ` Simon Wright
2014-12-30 11:45 ` Hubert
2014-12-30 20:07 ` Brad Moore
2014-12-30 22:11 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-01-01 12:28 ` Georg Bauhaus
2015-01-02 20:37 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-01-02 21:13 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-01-02 21:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-01-02 22:17 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-12-31 0:15 ` Luke A. Guest
2014-12-30 16:24 ` sbelmont700
2014-12-30 18:21 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox