From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:49:32 +0100
Date: 2017-07-05T10:49:32+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly1spv2oyb.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ojh91a$3dp$1@gioia.aioe.org
Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> writes:
> By the way,
>
> type Syntax_Description_Type is access constant Syntax_Description_Record
> with Convention => C;
>
> This isn't `access constant RDF.Auxiliary.Dummy_Record` but is memory
> compatible with it.
Well, the conventions are different.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-04 17:49 Strict aliasing, is it OK? Victor Porton
2017-07-04 17:50 ` Victor Porton
2017-07-04 18:06 ` Victor Porton
2017-07-04 18:15 ` Niklas Holsti
2017-07-04 18:30 ` Victor Porton
2017-07-04 19:29 ` Niklas Holsti
2017-07-04 20:11 ` Victor Porton
2017-07-04 20:13 ` Victor Porton
2017-07-04 21:41 ` Simon Wright
2017-07-04 23:39 ` Victor Porton
2017-07-05 9:49 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2017-07-08 17:29 ` Robert Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox