From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Re: Unchecked_Union record inside an other record - trouble
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 19:56:15 +0300
Date: 2014-08-08T19:56:15+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ls2vfc$qit$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ac7bcc2f-cafb-4bcc-a52e-931c094ce45a@googlegroups.com
Adam Beneschan wrote:
> On Friday, August 8, 2014 8:36:48 AM UTC-7, Victor Porton wrote:
>> I am trying to interface my program with a C library.
>
>> The below program does not compile:
>> main.adb:19:14: unconstrained subtype in component declaration
>
>> If this does not work, what should I do to interface a union inside a
>> struct in a C library?
>
>> -- main.adb
>>
>> with Interfaces.C; use Interfaces.C;
>
>> procedure Main is
>
>> type Kind is (First, Second);
>
>> type T(K: Kind) is
>
> change this to
>
> type T(K: Kind := Kind'First) is
Done.
But it is a hack.
I propose to change ARM not to require a discriminant in this specific case
(Unchecked_Union).
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-08 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-08 15:36 Unchecked_Union record inside an other record - trouble Victor Porton
2014-08-08 16:01 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-08 16:56 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2014-08-08 18:52 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 19:56 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 20:06 ` Pascal Obry
2014-08-08 20:09 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 20:12 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 20:22 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 20:28 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 21:07 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 19:52 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 19:57 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-08 19:21 ` Per Sandberg
2014-08-08 20:01 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 21:23 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-10 7:25 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox