From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: We should introduce aliased types
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:49:13 -0500
Date: 2014-08-01T14:49:13-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lrgqvq$4oi$1@loke.gir.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lrgqnq$4i3$1@loke.gir.dk
"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote in message
news:lrgqnq$4i3$1@loke.gir.dk...
> "Victor Porton" <porton@narod.ru> wrote in message
...
> And you can't directly declare a component as
> Ptr : access T := T'Access;
> because of accessibility; the problem isn't whether T is aliased or not.
> "access T" is a library-level type, while T'Access might refer to a local
> object, so the access type could outlive the object (in particular, this
> component could be copied into an object of another library-level type),
> and that's not allowed.
Actually, you can do that so long as you use Unchecked_Access:
type T is limited record
Ptr : access T := T'Unchecked_Access;
end record;
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 18:54 We should introduce aliased types Victor Porton
2014-08-01 18:56 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-01 19:16 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-01 19:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-08-01 19:57 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-01 19:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-08-01 19:49 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2014-08-01 20:39 ` sbelmont700
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox