From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: unconstrained subtype in component declaration
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:13 +0300
Date: 2014-07-27T18:13:00+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lr34tq$air$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
As I've told in my previous thread in c.l.a, I want a function to return two
values.
A fragment of my real code:
type Filename_And_Fragment is
record
Filename: String;
Fragment: String;
end record;
function URI_String_To_Filename_And_Fragment(Str: String) return
Filename_And_Fragment;
rdf-raptor-uri.ads:63:20: unconstrained subtype in component declaration
The compiler does not accept this. What to do? (I do not want to create a
full fledged object with access-to-String fields and Get_*() accessors and
Unchecked_Deallocation in finalization.)
Should I step back to "out" argument of a procedure instead of returning a
record like this as a return value of a function? (there were reasons why
this would be better).
Or should I just add two discriminants to the record?
After some practice with Ada, I feel that it is probably not that good as I
thought earlier.
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
next reply other threads:[~2014-07-27 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-27 15:13 Victor Porton [this message]
2014-07-27 15:21 ` unconstrained subtype in component declaration Peter Chapin
2014-07-27 15:27 ` Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox