From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Deallocating an object twice
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:39:32 -0500
Date: 2014-07-26T21:39:32-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lr1op4$d1p$1@loke.gir.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lr11gd$log$2@speranza.aioe.org
"Victor Porton" <porton@narod.ru> wrote in message
news:lr11gd$log$2@speranza.aioe.org...
> Victor Porton wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly, it is an undefined behavior (or is it called
>> unbounded error?) if a pool access is deallocated twice with
>> Unchecked_Deallocation.
>>
>> I think it should be a Program_Error (if checks are on).
>>
>> Why was not this done even in Ada2012 (not speaking about older Ada)?
>>
>> It's bad.
>>
>> Or is it done and I just miss it?
>
> The same should be done if attempt to deallocate an access which never has
> been allocated (for example, if it is an aliased object on the stack).
>
> --
> Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-27 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-26 19:55 Deallocating an object twice Victor Porton
2014-07-26 20:02 ` Victor Porton
2014-07-27 2:39 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2014-07-27 2:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-07-27 8:31 ` Simon Wright
2014-07-27 11:30 ` anon
2014-07-27 12:47 ` Peter Chapin
2014-07-27 15:29 ` Stephen Leake
2014-07-27 15:34 ` Victor Porton
2014-07-28 15:15 ` Stephen Leake
2014-07-28 16:15 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox