comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Deallocating an object twice
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 22:55:50 +0300
Date: 2014-07-26T22:55:50+03:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <lr1142$log$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)

If I understand correctly, it is an undefined behavior (or is it called 
unbounded error?) if a pool access is deallocated twice with 
Unchecked_Deallocation.

I think it should be a Program_Error (if checks are on).

Why was not this done even in Ada2012 (not speaking about older Ada)?

It's bad.

Or is it done and I just miss it?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org

             reply	other threads:[~2014-07-26 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-26 19:55 Victor Porton [this message]
2014-07-26 20:02 ` Deallocating an object twice Victor Porton
2014-07-27  2:39   ` Randy Brukardt
2014-07-27  2:42   ` Randy Brukardt
2014-07-27  8:31 ` Simon Wright
2014-07-27 11:30 ` anon
2014-07-27 12:47   ` Peter Chapin
2014-07-27 15:29 ` Stephen Leake
2014-07-27 15:34   ` Victor Porton
2014-07-28 15:15     ` Stephen Leake
2014-07-28 16:15       ` Simon Wright
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox