From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Deallocating an object twice
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 22:55:50 +0300
Date: 2014-07-26T22:55:50+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lr1142$log$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
If I understand correctly, it is an undefined behavior (or is it called
unbounded error?) if a pool access is deallocated twice with
Unchecked_Deallocation.
I think it should be a Program_Error (if checks are on).
Why was not this done even in Ada2012 (not speaking about older Ada)?
It's bad.
Or is it done and I just miss it?
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
next reply other threads:[~2014-07-26 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-26 19:55 Victor Porton [this message]
2014-07-26 20:02 ` Deallocating an object twice Victor Porton
2014-07-27 2:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-07-27 2:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-07-27 8:31 ` Simon Wright
2014-07-27 11:30 ` anon
2014-07-27 12:47 ` Peter Chapin
2014-07-27 15:29 ` Stephen Leake
2014-07-27 15:34 ` Victor Porton
2014-07-28 15:15 ` Stephen Leake
2014-07-28 16:15 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox