From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Re: Should be in the root package or its child?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:20:47 +0300
Date: 2014-07-25T15:20:47+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lqti2s$bae$2@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6fd2e985-1a41-442e-a6c8-6a9f90960e94@googlegroups.com
AdaMagica wrote:
> On Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:21:40 PM UTC+2, Victor Porton wrote:
>
>> package RDF.Raptor is
>>
>> end RDF.Raptor;
>
> What do you gain with an empty package?
Empty packages are meant to facilitate hierarchy.
>> But on the other hand, things become more finely classified if I use
>> child packages.
>
> That's OK, this is the purpose of child packages. But again, what do gain
> with an empty top package and having the world in a child, especially if
> every user has to with it?
>
>> So, do you insist, that it should not be in a child library package?
>
> No, I don't insist - after all, it's your code.
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-23 18:58 Should be in the root package or its child? Victor Porton
2014-07-23 19:02 ` Victor Porton
2014-07-24 9:06 ` AdaMagica
2014-07-24 16:21 ` Victor Porton
2014-07-25 8:52 ` AdaMagica
2014-07-25 12:20 ` Victor Porton [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox