Re: Function definitions - with clarification

[Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP>]

On 2014-06-22, montgrimpulo <aghte@hotlinemail.com> wrote:
> Direct reply to Shark8
>
> What is the point of saying "the above won't work" when it was
> obviously forgotten to indicate a type ? What is the point of changing my
> function F into a procedure F with an embedded procedure G ?
> This does not make sense at all.
>  What is then left as your contribution ?
>

You need to lose the attitude.

There are a number of people here who are trying to help you but
both your problem description and your level of Ada knowledge
are unclear.

Shark8's response was a good faith effort to correct you on Ada
syntax because it's unclear what your level of Ada knowledge is.
My questions, along with the questions others are asking you, are
good faith attempts to try and help you clarify the problem so
someone can offer more precise guidance.

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world