From: leschkes@ferret.cig.mot.com (Scott Leschke)
Subject: Re: some questions re. Ada/GNAT from a C++/GCC user
Date: 1996/03/28
Date: 1996-03-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <leschkes.828053356@ferret> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wnewmanDoxrCp.DKv@netcom.com
wnewman@netcom.com (Bill Newman) writes:
>When I make two different instantiations of a generic package with the
>same arguments, I understand the compiler treats them formally as two
>different packages, which is OK with me. However, I'd appreciate
>knowing the compiler wouldn't actually output two redundant copies of
>the corresponding (identical?) machine code, but instead share the
>code. I saw somewhere that the compiler is given considerable freedom
>to share one instantiation between several arguments if it thinks it's
>appropriate, which is also OK with me. However, I haven't seen any
>guarantee that the compiler won't output redundant copies for
>instantiations with identical arguments. Is there such a guarantee?
My first question would be, why do you want redundant instantiations.
Note that Ada separates instantiation of a generic from use of the
resulting package/subunit. The general rule of thumb to avoid code-bloat
due to duplicate instantiations is to do the instantiation at the library
level and 'with' the resulting package/subunit.
>Why doesn't Ada 95 allow declarations to be interspersed with ordinary
>statements as C++ does? (Or does it? _Ada as a Second Language_ is a
>big book!) It seems to me that the C++ approach is a small but
>definite win. Does it interact very badly somehow with all those
>guarantees on elaboration order?
You can use a block statement. This is different than C++ in the sense
that objects declared within the block are only in existence within the
block and are finalized at the end. A block can also have its own
exception handlers. The syntactic form is (from page 500 of the LRM):
block statement ::=
[block_statement_identifier:]
[declare
declarative_part]
begin
handled_sequence_of_statements
end [block_identifier];
Note that the block identifier and declaration section are optional.
For example:
declare
Obj : Pkg.SomeType;
begin
Pkg.Operation (Object => Obj);
-- Other stuff
exception
when Pkg.Some_Exception =>
Do_Something;
end;
--
Scott Leschke.........................email: leschkes@cig.mot.com
Motorola, Inc............................ph: 847-632-2786
1501 W Shure Drive......................fax: 847-632-3145
Arlington Heights, IL 60004......mailstop: 1301
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-27 0:00 some questions re. Ada/GNAT from a C++/GCC user Bill Newman
1996-03-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1996-03-29 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-03-31 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1996-03-31 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Glenn H. Porter
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Jonas Nygren
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Geert Bosch
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Scott Leschke
1996-04-04 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Bruce.Conroy
1996-03-31 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-31 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-02 0:00 ` David Shochat
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Scott Leschke [this message]
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Richard Pitre
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-03-31 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-01 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-02 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-04-09 0:00 ` Matt Kennel
1996-04-03 0:00 ` David Emery
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Felaco
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Mark A Biggar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Bill Newman
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-03-29 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Mark A Biggar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Iterators (was Re: some questions re. Ada/GNAT from a C++/GCC user) Robert I. Eachus
1996-03-31 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-03-31 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
[not found] ` <4jlj79$h1k@Nntp1.mcs.net>
1996-04-01 0:00 ` some questions re. Ada/GNAT from a C++/GCC user Robert A Duff
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Kevin Cline
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-04 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-03-30 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Laurent Guerby
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-03-28 0:00 Simon Johnston
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox