* Re: OS/2 GNAT and threads
[not found] ` <3i3eba$hve@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
@ 1995-02-22 20:06 ` Scott Leschke
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Scott Leschke @ 1995-02-22 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>It is NOT a good idea going and doing your own thread creation in a GNAT
>context. Lots of things will break!
And why on earth would you want to anyway ? That low-level thread stuff
is best left to compiler implementors and C programmer types who don't
have a better alternative.
Scott Leschke
Motorola Inc.
I normally don't use a disclaimer but I'll say that this time this is
strictly MHO and not necessarily my employers. Actually I doubt Motorola
as a corporation has an opinion on this matter but it needed to be said
just the same.
--
Scott Leschke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1995-02-22 20:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3hg3mq$f7j@jerry.rb.icl.co.uk>
[not found] ` <3hr4i9$rs2@cyclope.enst.fr>
[not found] ` <3htq1m$a98@corona.VisiCom.COM>
[not found] ` <3i3eba$hve@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
1995-02-22 20:06 ` OS/2 GNAT and threads Scott Leschke
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox