From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Gnat error msg meaning?
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:46:09 GMT
Date: 2002-12-27T20:46:09+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <l_2P9.473950$WL3.124126@rwcrnsc54> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x7v1y43z0sa.fsf@smaug.pushface.org
> > is new root.Store_Type(Max_Strings, Max_Characters, Task_Safe)
>
> is new root.Store_Type
>
> > with private;
>
> compiles OK with GCC 3.2.
Interesting. Dropping mention of the parent's constraints until the
full, private, declaration, does seem to solve the problem with Gnat. One
of the other compilers doesn't seem to care either way, but the third one
points out RM 3.7(13) "The parent subtype shall be constrained;". Who's
right?
In the meantime, sounds like I need two different versions of this
spec for two different compilers. :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-27 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-26 23:22 Gnat error msg meaning? tmoran
2002-12-27 20:04 ` Simon Wright
2002-12-27 20:46 ` tmoran [this message]
[not found] <bbegua.m94.ln@beastie.ix.netcom.com>
2002-12-27 4:59 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox