From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: C to Ada conversion
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:24:17 GMT
Date: 2003-01-14T18:24:17+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lBYU9.72633$3v.13223@sccrnsc01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: toYU9.678062$WL3.715692@rwcrnsc54
> >ok but otherwise it is very dangerous because it does not take into
> >account that in Ada the index range of arrays does not necessarly
On second thought, a more accurate translation from the C, and
one that would be less general and thus perhaps show better in a
benchmark, would be to replace
type Matrices is array (Integer range <>, Integer range <>) of Float;
by
Rs : constant := 6;
type Matrices is array (1 .. Rs, 1 .. Rs) of Float;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-14 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-13 21:22 C to Ada conversion Mark
2003-01-13 23:14 ` tmoran
2003-01-14 1:27 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-01-14 3:16 ` tmoran
2003-01-14 12:52 ` Mark
2003-01-14 19:35 ` John R. Strohm
2003-01-14 7:20 ` Martin Dowie
2003-01-14 8:49 ` tmoran
2003-01-14 22:45 ` Martin Dowie
2003-01-14 13:01 ` Mark
2003-01-14 17:18 ` Dr. Michael Paus
2003-01-14 18:10 ` tmoran
2003-01-14 18:24 ` tmoran [this message]
2003-01-14 19:48 ` Dr. Michael Paus
2003-01-14 20:12 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2003-01-14 21:55 ` tmoran
2003-01-16 21:17 ` Mark
2003-01-17 0:10 ` tmoran
2003-01-17 1:09 ` John R. Strohm
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox