From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: GNAT.Sockets: Timeval_Duration is in milliseconds?
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:32:14 +0100
Date: 2007-12-09T10:32:15+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <l2uuh4u7w9os$.102khbvpzbn0y.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9d687056-c98b-405a-b166-afddac34f109@e67g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:45:34 -0800 (PST), gpriv@axonx.com wrote:
> I find it somewhat misleading that Timeout values use different scale
> than Ada duration while share that type (not Ada way). Is there a
> purpose in that (other than direct translation in socket library). It
> does cost some headache to figure that out and it would be more
> appropriate in Ada style to make a new type for timeouts or scale it
> back to seconds. Anyone would agree?
I do.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-09 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-08 19:45 GNAT.Sockets: Timeval_Duration is in milliseconds? gpriv
2007-12-08 22:11 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-08 22:34 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 1:45 ` tmoran
2007-12-09 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 12:50 ` Gautier
2007-12-09 13:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 14:59 ` Martin Krischik
2007-12-09 17:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 15:55 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 17:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 18:26 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-09 19:36 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 22:51 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-09 23:27 ` gpriv
2007-12-10 20:06 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-10 21:02 ` gpriv
2007-12-11 20:33 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-13 3:44 ` gpriv
2007-12-13 13:13 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-13 14:32 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 19:46 ` tmoran
2007-12-09 9:01 ` Martin Krischik
2007-12-09 9:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox