From: Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: GNATBench 2.1.0 (free) and file/procedure naming case
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:34:23 +0100
Date: 2009-03-11T09:34:23+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <l2t7pg.qqc.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f55fcbb-dc38-4c23-a581-f0d475547dfa@e2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
sjw a �crit :
>> In short: name your units as you please, and let the environment choose
>> the appropriate file name for you.
>
> I don't think this can be right. See the GNAT Project Manager page on
> *file* naming:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.0/gnat_ugn_unw/Naming-Schemes.html#Naming-Schemes
>
Yes, of course, you can change the convention from the default one, but
I think the problem the OP had is that *some* files had names that did
not follow the default (or any other) convention.
So my advice can become: choose any convention you like for file names,
but once you have it, let the environment deal with file names. And by
all means, be consistent.
> Personally, though, I'd go with the default: lower-case filenames,
> mixed-case Ada names (and, John, I think you'd have a better chance of
> getting GNATbench to use mixed case in some predictable way if you
> Used_Underscores ratherThanRunningThingsTogether)
Agreed
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-11 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 15:41 GNATBench 2.1.0 (free) and file/procedure naming case John McCabe
2009-03-09 19:50 ` britt.snodgrass
2009-03-10 11:38 ` John McCabe
2009-03-10 12:28 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-03-10 21:27 ` sjw
2009-03-11 8:34 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen [this message]
2009-03-16 20:19 ` Brian Gaffney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox