From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with limited with
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:13:37 -0700
Date: 2013-07-27T10:13:37-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kt0uo3$3kh$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c482c038-dd30-44c1-ac3b-f0334d9d28e5@googlegroups.com>
On 07/27/2013 09:00 AM, Shark8 wrote:
>
> To be fair, the ONLY reason I have to use anonymous access types at all there
> is because GNAT chokes up when I try to use the type itself. (I think there's
> a comment to that effect elsewhere.)
About the only thing you can do with limited with is declare access types
designating the types in the withed pkg, So of course an Ada compiler complains
if you try to do anything else. When you avoid visible access types, you
naturally avoid limited with. This is how I've been able to work on large
projects (> 1000 pkgs) without a single limited with.
--
Jeff Carter
"This trial is a travesty. It's a travesty of a mockery of a
sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. ...
Do you realize there's not a single homosexual on that jury?"
Bananas
27
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-27 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 19:14 Problem with limited with Simon Wright
2013-07-26 20:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-26 22:17 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-26 22:25 ` Shark8
2013-07-26 22:35 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-27 0:17 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-27 1:08 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-27 8:05 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-27 2:32 ` Shark8
2013-07-27 5:42 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-27 16:00 ` Shark8
2013-07-27 17:13 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2013-07-27 19:21 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-28 2:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-07-27 3:55 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox