From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with limited with
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:42:27 -0700
Date: 2013-07-26T22:42:27-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ksvm86$5hu$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42dc042d-e458-42a4-abb7-23907982b88f@googlegroups.com>
On 07/26/2013 07:32 PM, Shark8 wrote:
>
> Is that a bad design-choice? If so, why?
Certainly. It uses anonymous types and visible access types, both Bad Ideas.
--
Jeff Carter
"What I wouldn't give for a large sock with horse manure in it."
Annie Hall
42
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-27 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 19:14 Problem with limited with Simon Wright
2013-07-26 20:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-26 22:17 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-26 22:25 ` Shark8
2013-07-26 22:35 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-27 0:17 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-27 1:08 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-27 8:05 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-27 2:32 ` Shark8
2013-07-27 5:42 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2013-07-27 16:00 ` Shark8
2013-07-27 17:13 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-27 19:21 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-28 2:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-07-27 3:55 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox