From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: ³A Comparison of Four Pseudo Random Number Generators Implemented in Ada²
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:18:38 -0700
Date: 2013-07-19T17:18:38-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kscklg$2c0$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CE0F7716.32CDD%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
On 07/19/2013 03:07 PM, Bill Findlay wrote:
>
> Why not use Ada.Numerics.{Discrete,Float}_Random ?
Those are excellent when you don't care what sequence of values you get from the
generator with different compilers or different platforms, but in those cases
where you need to portably obtain the same sequence for the same seed value(s),
you need to use something else.
--
Jeff Carter
"You a big nose have it."
Never Give a Sucker an Even Break
107
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-20 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 19:28 “A Comparison of Four Pseudo Random Number Generators Implemented in Ada” Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2013-07-19 21:43 ` Shark8
2013-07-19 22:07 ` ³A Comparison of Four Pseudo Random Number Generators Implemented in Ada² Bill Findlay
2013-07-20 0:18 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2013-07-20 0:41 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox