From: "nicolas" <n.brunot@cadwin.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT/GCC 3.0?
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:15:28 GMT
Date: 2001-08-10T11:15:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <knPc7.2421$742.1784967@nnrp3.proxad.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6BbNZYxtKoM8@eisner.encompasserve.org
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 716 bytes --]
In the middle of June, R.Dewar talked about days/weeks rather than months
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg01053.html
According to that, this should happen in the next few days
"Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam> a �crit dans le
message news: 6BbNZYxtKoM8@eisner.encompasserve.org...
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108091330420.130-100000@2067.resnet.uni.edu>,
<lange92@2067.resnet.uni.edu> writes:
> > A while back I read something about GCC including gnat in the main gcc
> > tree. Has anyone heard about the plans to include it in gcc recently?
>
> Yes, I have read about it in this newsgroup within the past two weeks.
> I don't remember the details, but you could check an archive.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-10 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-09 18:37 GNAT/GCC 3.0? lange92
2001-08-10 2:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-08-10 10:42 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-10 11:15 ` nicolas [this message]
2001-08-10 12:50 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox