From: kmradke@inav.net (Kevin Radke)
Subject: Re: objectada for GREAT programs ?
Date: 1996/10/24
Date: 1996-10-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kmradke-2410961946480001@dip22.inav.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 326E457E.41C67EA6@aut.alcatel.at
In article <326E457E.41C67EA6@aut.alcatel.at>, Walter Leidenfrost
<leidenfr@aut.alcatel.at> wrote:
> Are there any experiences with Objectada for winNT,
> as far as handling of real HUGE sources (all in all approx. 7MB) are
> concerned ? Compilation times, etc ?
I (re)compile 200k+ lines of code on a regular basis. Code alone is
at least 20Mb, with the largest executable almost 10meg in size. Total
build directory size is well over 200Mb. The whole thing usually
takes around 2.5 hours to build from scratch on a P120
with 32Mb of memory. Would do better with more memory and
a fast SCSI drive instead of IDE...
Kevin
--
/\/\Under Construction/\/\ kmradke@inav.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-10-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-10-23 0:00 objectada for GREAT programs ? Walter Leidenfrost
1996-10-24 0:00 ` Kevin Radke [this message]
1996-10-25 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-10-26 0:00 ` Kevin Radke
1996-10-28 0:00 ` objectada for GREAT programs ? - SLOC phys vs logical? Robert S. White
1996-10-28 0:00 ` David Weller
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox