From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 vs Ada 2012
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:40:42 -0700
Date: 2013-03-27T09:40:42-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kiv7a9$d08$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b6dnawcsYaRSs_MRVn_vwA@giganews.com>
On 03/27/2013 04:24 AM, Peter C. Chapin wrote:
>
> That said, one of the attractions of the Barnes book is its comprehensiveness.
> Trimming back material would potentially take away from that.
Seems to me that if a comprehensive text for a language doesn't fit in a single
volume, that's a sign that the language has become Too Damn Big.
--
Jeff Carter
"The time has come to act, and act fast. I'm leaving."
Blazing Saddles
36
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 11:24 Ada 2005 vs Ada 2012 Gour
2013-03-26 15:11 ` Shark8
2013-03-26 21:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-03-26 22:24 ` Peter C. Chapin
2013-03-27 7:26 ` Gour
2013-03-27 8:48 ` Maciej Sobczak
2013-03-27 11:24 ` Peter C. Chapin
2013-03-27 14:47 ` Shark8
2013-03-27 16:40 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2013-03-27 16:52 ` Eryndlia Mavourneen
2013-03-27 17:32 ` Bill Findlay
2013-03-27 18:19 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-03-27 18:25 ` Bill Findlay
2013-03-29 21:43 ` Stephen Leake
2013-03-27 7:25 ` Gour
2013-03-27 18:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-03-27 19:39 ` Gour
2014-05-18 7:43 ` nosratinia
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox