comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: ADA/C interfaces: type representations uncontrollable in C
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 12:24:09 -0600
Date: 2005-11-05T12:24:09-06:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <kfydnTHkCcBUZfHeRVn-vA@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrndmpusg.1v5.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org

> I'm beginning to realize that it's impossible to write compiler
> independant ADA code if it must interface with C code.  Even rep
> spec'ing down to the bitwise rep specs makes no guarantess that the
> chosen layout will match what all C compilers produce (since they can
> potentially all be different).
   Yes, "it's impossible to write compiler independant" C code since
C compilers can potentially all be different.
   More commonly you are interfacing to an existing C system, which
is compiled with a particular C compiler, eg, Windows and MS C++.
In that case there is a non-moving target and you can write Ada code
that is nearly* independent of the particular Ada compiler.
   *Particular Ada compilers have quirks and bugs that you may have to
get around in different ways.  CLAW's rep spec clauses for instance
work fine with MS Windows, but there are a few other things where there's
different code for different Ada compilers, and one of the tasks is
keeping up with the latest versions of compilers.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-05 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-04  2:21 Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Anonymous Coward
2005-11-04  2:36 ` Steve
2005-11-04  4:11   ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-04  5:30     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-05  3:13       ` Steve
2005-11-05  4:45         ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-06 14:05           ` Steve
2005-11-06 16:08             ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-07  7:25             ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-08 13:36               ` Steve
2005-11-14  1:12             ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-14  3:03               ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-14 18:08                 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-14 18:49                 ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-15  1:16                   ` ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily? Anonymous Coward
2005-11-15  2:10                     ` tmoran
2005-11-15  3:12                     ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-15  6:44                     ` Simon Wright
2005-11-16  0:16                       ` Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?) Björn Persson
2005-11-16  5:38                         ` Adaists Deny Acronym Simon Wright
2005-11-16  6:16                         ` Adaists Deny Acronym. (was: ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily?) Samuel Tardieu
2005-11-15 12:43                     ` ADA compilers can reject types arbitrarily? Jeff Creem
2005-11-14 21:14                 ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Simon Wright
2005-11-04 13:26     ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 14:33       ` Marc A. Criley
2005-11-04 18:35         ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-11-04 20:07           ` Britt Snodgrass
2005-11-04 14:39       ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 15:27         ` Britt Snodgrass
2005-11-04 15:55           ` Lauri Ora
2005-11-04 21:42             ` Larry Kilgallen
2005-11-05  2:26             ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05  2:42               ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-05  3:27               ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05  3:55                 ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05  4:07                 ` Lauri Ora
2005-11-05 13:46                   ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05 10:14                 ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-04 16:52         ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-04 16:57           ` Frank J. Lhota
2005-11-04 23:27           ` tmoran
2005-11-05 10:25           ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-14  1:09             ` Robert A Duff
2005-11-05  3:33       ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 10:34         ` Stephen Leake
2005-11-05 16:35           ` ADA/C interfaces: type representations uncontrollable in C Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 16:49             ` Ed Falis
2005-11-05 18:24             ` tmoran [this message]
2005-11-09  2:12           ` 'Size can mean value size OR object size, depending Anonymous Coward
2005-11-09  3:27             ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-09  4:04               ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-05 14:27         ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Michael Bode
2005-11-05 16:17           ` pragma convention Anonymous Coward
2005-11-06  1:07             ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-06 22:22               ` Anonymous Coward
2005-11-07  7:34                 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-11-05 14:39         ` Default rep specs for record types - documented?? Martin Krischik
2005-11-04  9:40   ` Martin Dowie
2005-11-04 14:36   ` Marc A. Criley
2005-11-04 17:45 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox