From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: types and subtypes
Date: 13 Mar 2006 13:14:20 -0600
Date: 2006-03-13T13:14:20-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kVkBp6FIA7D3@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1142273325.634632.41020@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com
In article <1142273325.634632.41020@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>, ada_student@yahoo.com writes:
> Why doesnt Ada subtyping also denote derivation as in the
> sense C++ base classes and derived classes do?
Perhaps because:
1. They are different languages.
2. C++ did not exist at the same time.
I haven't followed the whole discussion, but an Ada type can be
derived from another Ada type. Subtypes are different.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 12:07 types and subtypes ada_student
2006-03-13 13:20 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-03-13 18:08 ` ada_student
2006-03-13 18:17 ` Ed Falis
2006-03-13 19:14 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2006-03-13 19:42 ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-13 20:22 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2006-03-14 8:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-14 14:39 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-03-17 1:24 ` Peter C. Chapin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox