From: Pi <pi3_1415926536@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: why? US Army Ada software converted to C++?
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 23:26:27 -0400
Date: 2001-10-07T23:26:27-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kL8w7.1271$FG6.407694@news20.bellglobal.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Vu5MWbKlnIGK@eisner.encompasserve.org
Larry Kilgallen wrote :
> In article <3BC0F319.C76E4E78@adaworks.com>, Richard Riehle
> <richard@adaworks.com> writes:
>
> > There is no accounting for the depth of stupidity among those making
> > programming language decisions. Unfortunately, this kind of thing
> > is more widespread than you might think. On the positive side, some
> > better informed contractors continue to realize the benefits of Ada and
> > use it for new projects.
>
> If the path of Ada is in fact superior, those contractors will rise to
> the top.
ROFL!
Since when has superiority any relation to succes???
We're using Windows, VHS-Disks, a cryppled Keyboard, etc
--
3,14159265359
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-08 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-06 21:56 why? US Army Ada software converted to C++? rob
2001-10-06 23:35 ` David Emery
2001-10-07 1:16 ` Jim44.
2001-10-07 7:31 ` tmoran
2001-10-07 21:22 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-07 22:00 ` James Rogers
2001-10-07 23:59 ` Dale Stanbrough
2001-10-08 0:10 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-09 18:12 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-09 19:05 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-09 20:36 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-09 22:01 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-07 1:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-10-07 12:09 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-09 16:03 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-08 0:28 ` Richard Riehle
2001-10-08 0:39 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-08 3:26 ` Pi [this message]
2001-10-09 16:06 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-08 10:41 ` Petter Fryklund
2001-10-08 13:20 ` Alfred Hilscher
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox